Showing posts with label P.D. James. Show all posts
Showing posts with label P.D. James. Show all posts

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Death of an Expert Witness

PD James is a master of detective fiction. She even wrote a book about it called, appropriately enough, TALKING ABOUT DETECTIVE FICTION. And in DEATH OF AN EXPERT WITNESS, she follows her own rules to a T. That is, she gives you a closed circle of possible murderers, and directs us skillfully away from the truth without ever lying. Virtually everyone in this vicious circle of suspects has a motive, and James gives us all we need to know to solve the crime. I didn’t, and I don’t think most people could have, but I didn’t feel cheated at the end. It was there to be figured out, but by a more cerebral fellow than myself.

At the center of it all is her great detective Inspector Dalgliesh. He is quite a bright fellow, this Dalgliesh, and he carries the pain of having lost a child within him, and the daily pain of having to watch the brutal things people do to each other. James is pretty smart herself, is an intellectual writer (and I mean that in a good way). I wonder if the habit of plumbing the depths of human depravity is as taxing to a writer as it is to a detective.

Dalgliesh is more of a Holmes or Poirot than a Marlowe or a Sam Spade. He solves crimes not by insulting and punching and having sex with suspects until the whole thing unravels, but by piecing the puzzle of violent death together with a surgeon’s precision. He does have the keen sense of human nature that Marlowe and Spade have, and he knows how to get what he wants from an interrogation, becoming all things to all people in ways that always serve his purposes.

I think there are three kinds of murder mysteries: the kind where everyone has a motive (like this one), the kind where it seems that no one has a motive, and the kind where the only person who seems to have a motive didn’t do it because in reality there is one other person who secretly had a motive. In this novel, there are two murders, and the action is framed by the investigation of a third, which happens mostly offstage.

If you go to a job with people you don’t like every day, take heart, because you don’t, at least, work at Hoggatt’s Lab. The people there are petty and vindictive in the most extreme ways, and before the novel is over we will have seen bullying, serial adultery, a vicious custody battle, extortion, a brother- sister relationship that gets very, very close to the incestuous, a semi-psychotic child, a corrupt cop who is a red herring, and who sells cannabis seized as evidence to supplement his retirement, two murders, and more. Dalgliesh feels, as he wades into this cesspool, that he should have worn boots, then waders, then a haz-mat suit.

The men in this tome are often feckless milksops, and the women can be hard and cruel. But I don’t think there was a stock character in the bunch. Everyone’s a round character (to steal a phrase from EM Forster). The cruel show compassion, the stupid have flashes of insight, the cowardly show a little gumption every once in a while. And people’s motives are never tidy as they struggle with their demons, not wanting to give in to their darker urges (but they do, oh they do).

And through it all, James handles characterization and action with a tough and terse poetry. In the final scene Dalgliesh he visits a clunch pit, a kind of peat bog, an ancient place in a rough and ready rural place near the North sea called the Fens, a place that is kind of like a parking lot or an alley in the worst part of town you can imagine, but it is a beautiful and sunny day and for a moment he forgets that death carries life around in the palm of its hand, and we are forever in danger of it deciding, as if on a whim, to close it:

Even the discarded beer cans glinted like bright toys and the wastepaper bowled along merrily in the wind. The air was keen and smelled of the sea. It was possible to believe that the Saturday shoppers trailing with their children across the scrubland were carrying their picnics to the beach, that the clunch field led on to dunes and marram grass, to the child-loud fringes of the sea.

Dalgliesh can never forget the cruelty of the world for long, though. Every character in the novel is driven by unconscious or even conscious desires. Even Dalgliesh, who admits that the death of his son has hardened him. And yet, existentialist, nihilist or cynic (or all three) that he is, fully aware of the blind malevolence of the universe he inhabits, he tries to impose a rough kind of human justice on it.

The pit is the place of the initial murder in the book, and is a much more forbidding and foreboding place at night. When Kerrison, a kind of M.E., a British Quincy, arrives on the scene of the murder, he finds an rusted out old vehicle in which a dead girl’s body sits lit by a pair of arc lights: “Thus brightly lit it looked, to Kerrison, like some grotesque and pretentious modern sculpture, symbolically poised on the brink of chaos.”

And when he encounters the girl, he thought she had “the vacuous look of an adult clown…the body, still outwardly so human, looked an absurd burlesque, the skin of the pallid cheek as artificial as the stained plastic of the car against which it rested.” These brief passages carry a lot of punch per pound, and they occur all through the book, forming a backdrop, a mood, that you just can’t shake.

So, who is the murderer, or murderers? Take your pick from this litter of lunatic losers. I thought I had a lot of borderline, narcissistic, sociopathic types at my job, but this goes beyond even civil service! And the irony, of course, is that those at Hoggatt’s Lab are there to provide justice to society, while they deny it to each other. Something about James’s prose makes me think of her as a nice lady, but if she isn’t evil, she certainly knows what evil is.

© 2015 Mike Welch

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Death of a Crime Writer


P.D. James changed my life. Cover Her Face introduced me to adult crime fiction.

It also introduced me to a world of people (both real and fictional) and events that I didn’t know about before I read her. My wish to see her interviewed spurred, in part, my first trip to London in 1990. London did rather steal the show but the interview was terrific.

James’ world was not that of Colonel Mustard in the Library with the Candlestick. Her books featured bludgeoned barristers and clerical corpses. She was great at depicting the carnage that could come in the wake of passion and deceit. She was perhaps less successful with the subtleties of flirtation and romance. In one book Adam Dalgliesh meets the woman he will marry and in the next they are “all in all to each other.” I never understood the attraction on either side. But the romance occurs in the very latest of her books and perhaps she realized she might not have time for languorous glances and murmured words of love.

In a wonderful essay, “Love in the Mystery Novel: Ought Adam to Marry Cordelia?”, James talked about the difficulties marriage posed for the working detective and said: “I can only say I have no plans at present to marry Dalgliesh to anyone. Yet even the best regulated characters are apt occasionally to escape from the sensible hand of their author and embark, however inadvisably, on a love life of their own.”

I saw James interviewed by Tim Heald at the 1990 Bouchercon in London. I was sitting toward the back of the auditorium and have to say that when she came out on the stage I was reminded of the Queen. She wore a floral print dress and had a handbag in the crook of her arm. She wore no fanciful hat.

She was very clear that Roy Marsden did not make her forget her original conception of Adam Dalgliesh as Marsden once claimed in an interview.

“He would say that, wouldn’t he?” she asked. “He’s an actor.”

Indeed it does seem totally nuts that a writer who spent years developing a character over a series of books would give up her idea of him based on the performance of a single actor.

She was also much too kind to a young woman, dressed in full Sherlock attire, who began her question with “Of course I don’t read your books…” The mystery writer next to me said, “Someone should murder her.”

I found out later that there was some confusion over who was going to get Ms. James to her signing which meant she was left wandering the halls. She was rescued by a delighted fan who got her safely to where other delighted fans were waiting for her.

James also wrote some non-fiction. Her diary of her 77th year, Time to Be in Earnest, is revealing in a reticent way (which is fine with me). I found that we had many reading interests in common. Anyone who loves Anthony Trollope gets extra points in my book. I was struck by her observation concerning Lily Dale: “I wonder if [Trollope] knew what a monster he had created in Lily Dale? Admittedly Crosbie is a cad, but I can’t help congratulating him on his escape. And I pity poor Mrs. Dale, destined to spend her old age with a resolutely single and masochistic Lily.” Those of you who’ve read the Chronicles of Barset know exactly what she’s talking about. Those of you who haven’t have hours of reading pleasure ahead of you.

I also enjoyed Talking About Detective Fiction though I found myself muttering under my breath and frequently disagreeing with her. I thought she was rather hard on Agatha Christie and I’m not sure she understood how very funny Raymond Chandler can be.

Finally, I once heard Terry Gross interview P.D James on Fresh Air. Somehow, the Ripley novels of Patricia Highsmith were mentioned. James ardently disapproved of them. In fact she was so ardent that I finished listening to the interview and went out immediately and bought several. I love them still.

P.D. James believed in a world of justice and Tom Ripley lives a very comfortable life despite his amorality and criminality.

We readers are fortunate that we never really lose a novelist. We don’t have to be satisfied with faded photographs and mementos. We just have to open a book to bring that writer and her characters to life over and over again.

© 2014 Stephanie Patterson