For many
years, I traveled all over the US and sometimes internationally teaching
training programs in corporations. Some
of that time, a great deal of it in my early years doing that work, I was
teaching business writing in manufacturing, package goods, advertising ,
pharmaceutical, and financial companies.
Teaching engineers, financial analysts, and marketers to write clearly
and concisely helped develop me as a writer. Every once in a while, one of my students
would give me and article or copies of pages from books that he or she thought would
help me make my points or teach my subject in a new way. At one point, an advertising account executive
gave me a couple of charts he found instructive. They offered ways of counting certain types
of words and then using scales to determine if a certain piece of writing was
easier or more difficult to read and also if it is interesting or not. When they turned up in a recent attempt to
make room in the file drawers, I looked at them in a different light and wondered
if they had any use in the writing of fiction.
Here they are:
The reading
level scale, if it actually works, might have some relevance to writers who are
hoping to break in to the children's or young adult market. It might also be useful for people who are
looking to break through to the mass market paperback market.
The scale
that measures how interesting the prose is never made a whole lot of sense to
me as it applied to a chemical researcher’s progress report or a
financial analyst’s conclusions, but writers of murder mysteries might actually use such a tool. Suppose one used it, not about the personal
connection to the author, but the personal connection to the characters.
What do
you think. Could/should a writer of
fiction use such a scale to measure his or her own work?
Annamaria Alfieri
